step 1. What exactly do Sugar Daters Would To one another? Sex versus. Relationship

The fresh new questionnaire contains 24 short finalized-concluded and you will brief discover-finished issues, in addition to history parameters. The previous questions gained details about skills away from economic transfers, frequency and you may amount of dates, group background, along with, for example, gender, age, and you can sexual orientation ( Dining table step 1), motivations having sugar relationships ( Dining table dos), and you will skills out of offering otherwise using escort features. The majority were hoping to find heterosexual arrangements, nevertheless heterosexual preference was healthier among the men participants (97 %) than among female respondents (61 percent). While the many years restrict to register on the website was 18, 10% of women claimed being younger than meet armenian ladies simply 18 (1417) (select Dining table step one, Shape 1 and you will Figure 2). 6 The latest unlock-finished inquiries treated the meanings and you may reasons up to sugar relationship. The new interviews and the survey was indeed held when you look at the Swedish. Gunnarsson interpreted data become cited on English.

Studies

The interview therefore the survey investigation was in fact examined qualitatively. Due to the fact interview studies given a lot more breadth, the survey studies considering breadth. Certain proportions of the brand new survey analysis have been examined quantitatively, such as for example, years, gender, and sexual direction. Interviews transcriptions and you can qualitative survey answers were canned in the NVivo owing to a mixture of analysis-inspired and build-inspired programming. The difficulty away from just how to classify sugar relationships (particularly in relation to prostitution) and problem of crucial versus. inherent motivations was conceptually type in this new programming processes. Logical memo composing was utilized to file habits and you may interesting templates while in the programming including an even more alternative learning of your own topic. According to the observance the matter portrayed an amazing array from means and you may experience, we searched for a way of categorizing these variations. It turned into obvious your feel didn’t vary collectively one single axis, thus, unlike splitting them on the you to definitely group of classes (cf. Scull 2020), i decided to cardio the study three key proportions one to came up as the most definitive organizers of differentiations: (1) Brand new standard articles of sugar relationships arrangements: Exactly what do sugar daters would to one another? (2) The fresh new different settlement inside: Just how are babies compensated? and you will (3) Babies’ inspirational known reasons for glucose dating: To what extent do they partake in the brand new plan because of the material experts otherwise as they appreciate the activities in the and off themselves? Throughout the following the, the newest interview and you will questionnaire research was analyzed together regarding some kinds of sugar dating based on for every differentiating aspect. Whenever possible, amounts are provided regarding your frequency of every classification certainly participants. Note, even though, that numbers commonly always user of your own greater population of glucose daters, hence participants will can’t be neatly split up into classes, since many provides a selection of more knowledge therefore the questions driving the content age group weren’t built to suits so it article’s analytical dimensions.

Show

The first dimension central to possess distinguishing between types of sugar dating issues this new basic posts of the glucose matchmaking arrangement. The newest carrying out away from sugar relationship would be divided into about three categories. In the first group, we find just sexual transaction; regarding the next, babies and daddies is involved with a more total relationship plan together with sex but and other things; from the 3rd, the latest parties mingle in the an internet dating-for example fashion, however, sex is not area of the arrangement.

Sex Merely

Half the new baby interviewees (7 of fifteen) and something daddy interviewee (step one from 9) equated sugar relationship either toward straightforward selling and buying regarding sex, otherwise advertised playing with glucose internet dating sites for this specific purpose, due to the fact only way of employing the website or as one means among others. Regarding the survey responses, thirteen per cent away from baby respondents and 3 per cent off daddy respondents unambiguously equated sugar relationship with prostitution or promoting/purchasing sex. Whenever asked about advantages of glucose dating versus other forms regarding relationships, one to survey respondent stated, It is far from a form of matchmaking [smiley]; you offer and purchase sex (baby, 28). A perennial motif regarding the situation would be the fact sugar relationship is a glossy security for prostitution, since the articulated by a different questionnaire respondent: This can be prostitution. The audience is for the care about-deceit. No body people wants to telephone call our selves hooker or john. So we altered the words and you will circulated they from inside the a better package (little one, 25). That it rough good sense throughout the the actual characteristics of glucose relationships contrasts to your emphasis from past look on the exactly how sugar daters tend to delimit the things they’re doing of prostitution and you may sex functions ( Chu and you may Laidler 2016; Nayar 2017) and can even getting pertaining to Swedish news, where glucose dating since a cover to have prostitution has been an excellent repeating theme ( Olsson 2019; Svenska Dagbladet 2017).